Tactical

Care Under Fire

The first phase of Tactical Combat Casualty Care, covering medical interventions delivered while the casualty and provider are still under effective hostile fire.

In the Field
Care Under Fire is the most counterintuitive phase to teach. The medical priority in this phase is suppressing the threat, not opening a kit. A medic who tries to deliver textbook trauma care while rounds are still landing produces more casualties, not fewer. The discipline of Care Under Fire is doing less, fast, and getting the patient to a place where you can actually work.
Common Mistake
Treating Care Under Fire like a hot zone version of standard trauma assessment instead of a separate doctrine with deliberately limited interventions.

Technical Detail

Care Under Fire is the first phase of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). It applies when the casualty and the medical provider are both within the effective range of hostile fire. The threat dominates every decision in this phase, and the doctrine recognizes that further medical effort is futile if the threat is allowed to produce additional casualties.

Priorities. Care Under Fire prioritizes a narrow set of actions:

Return fire. Suppression of the threat is the first medical intervention because additional casualties stop the medical effort entirely.

Direct casualty self-aid. A casualty who is conscious and able to fight or move should be directed to do so.

Move the casualty to cover when feasible.

Apply tourniquets for life-threatening extremity hemorrhage. Tourniquet application is the only routine medical intervention performed during Care Under Fire because it is fast, can be self-applied, and addresses the leading preventable cause of death without requiring detailed assessment.

What is deferred. Detailed patient assessment, airway management, chest seal application, IV access, and most other interventions are deferred until the casualty can be moved out of effective fire to Tactical Field Care.

Civilian parallel. Care Under Fire corresponds doctrinally to Direct Threat Care in the civilian TECC framework. The principles are similar; the operational context differs.